aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer_lockup.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* selftests/bpf: Skip timer cases when bpf_timer is not supportedLeon Hwang2025-09-101-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When enable CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT, verifier will reject bpf_timer with returning -EOPNOTSUPP. Therefore, skip test cases when errno is EOPNOTSUPP. cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf ./test_progs -t timer 125 free_timer:SKIP 456 timer:SKIP 457/1 timer_crash/array:SKIP 457/2 timer_crash/hash:SKIP 457 timer_crash:SKIP 458 timer_lockup:SKIP 459 timer_mim:SKIP Summary: 5/0 PASSED, 6 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
* selftests/bpf: skip the timer_lockup test for single-CPU nodesViktor Malik2024-11-111-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The timer_lockup test needs 2 CPUs to work, on single-CPU nodes it fails to set thread affinity to CPU 1 since it doesn't exist: # ./test_progs -t timer_lockup test_timer_lockup:PASS:timer_lockup__open_and_load 0 nsec test_timer_lockup:PASS:pthread_create thread1 0 nsec test_timer_lockup:PASS:pthread_create thread2 0 nsec timer_lockup_thread:PASS:cpu affinity 0 nsec timer_lockup_thread:FAIL:cpu affinity unexpected error: 22 (errno 0) test_timer_lockup:PASS: 0 nsec #406 timer_lockup:FAIL Skip the test if only 1 CPU is available. Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <[email protected]> Fixes: 50bd5a0c658d1 ("selftests/bpf: Add timer lockup selftest") Tested-by: Philo Lu <[email protected]> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
* selftests/bpf: Add timer lockup selftestKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi2024-07-111-0/+91
Add a selftest that tries to trigger a situation where two timer callbacks are attempting to cancel each other's timer. By running them continuously, we hit a condition where both run in parallel and cancel each other. Without the fix in the previous patch, this would cause a lockup as hrtimer_cancel on either side will wait for forward progress from the callback. Ensure that this situation leads to a EDEADLK error. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]