| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Even though it's not relevant in selftests, the people
might still copy-paste from them. So let's take care
of optlen > 4096 cases explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Convert the selftest to use the preferred ASSERT_* macros instead of the
deprecated CHECK().
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BPF object files are, in a way, the final artifact produced as part of
the ahead-of-time compilation process. That makes them somewhat special
compared to "regular" object files, which are a intermediate build
artifacts that can typically be removed safely. As such, it can make
sense to name them differently to make it easier to spot this difference
at a glance.
Among others, libbpf-bootstrap [0] has established the extension .bpf.o
for BPF object files. It seems reasonable to follow this example and
establish the same denomination for selftest build artifacts. To that
end, this change adjusts the corresponding part of the build system and
the test programs loading BPF object files to work with .bpf.o files.
[0] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf-bootstrap
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Migrate all the selftests that were still using bpf_prog_load_xattr().
Few are converted to skeleton, others will use bpf_object__open_file()
API.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Normalize all the other non-conforming SEC() usages across all
selftests. This is in preparation for libbpf to start to enforce
stricter SEC() rules in libbpf 1.0 mode.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.
Fixes: 65b4414a05eb ("selftests/bpf: add sockopt test that exercises BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
|
Move the files, adjust includes, remove entry from Makefile & .gitignore
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
