| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently dw_pcie_ep_init_notify() wrapper just calls pci_epc_init_notify()
directly, so this wrapper provides no benefit to the glue drivers.
Remove it and call pci_epc_init_notify() directly from glue drivers.
Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
"core_init_notifier" flag is set by the glue drivers requiring refclk from
the host to complete the DWC core initialization. Also, those drivers will
send a notification to the EPF drivers once the initialization is fully
completed using the pci_epc_init_notify() API. Only then, the EPF drivers
will start functioning.
For the rest of the drivers generating refclk locally, EPF drivers will
start functioning post binding with them. EPF drivers rely on the
'core_init_notifier' flag to differentiate between the drivers.
Unfortunately, this creates two different flows for the EPF drivers.
So to avoid that, let's get rid of the "core_init_notifier" flag and follow
a single initialization flow for the EPF drivers. This is done by calling
the dw_pcie_ep_init_notify() from all glue drivers after the completion of
dw_pcie_ep_init_registers() API. This will allow all the glue drivers to
send the notification to the EPF drivers once the initialization is fully
completed.
Only difference here is that, the drivers requiring refclk from host will
send the notification once refclk is received, while others will send it
during probe time itself.
But this also requires the EPC core driver to deliver the notification
after EPF driver bind. Because, the glue driver can send the notification
before the EPF drivers bind() and in those cases the EPF drivers will miss
the event. To accommodate this, EPC core is now caching the state of the
EPC initialization in 'init_complete' flag and pci-ep-cfs driver sends the
notification to EPF drivers based on that after each EPF driver bind.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Tested-by: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
drivers
Currently, dw_pcie_ep_init_registers() API is directly called by the glue
drivers requiring active refclk from host. But for the other drivers, it is
getting called implicitly by dw_pcie_ep_init(). This is due to the fact
that this API initializes DWC EP specific registers and that requires an
active refclk (either from host or generated locally by endpoint itsef).
But, this causes a discrepancy among the glue drivers. So to avoid this
confusion, let's call this API directly from all glue drivers irrespective
of refclk dependency. Only difference here is that the drivers requiring
refclk from host will call this API only after the refclk is received and
other drivers without refclk dependency will call this API right after
dw_pcie_ep_init().
With this change, the check for 'core_init_notifier' flag can now be
dropped from dw_pcie_ep_init() API. This will also allow us to remove the
'core_init_notifier' flag completely in the later commits.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The definition of a reserved BAR is that EPF drivers should not touch
them.
The definition of only_64bit is that the EPF driver must configure this
BAR as 64-bit. (An EPF driver is not allowed to choose if this BAR should
be configured as 32-bit or 64-bit.)
Thus, it does not make sense to put only_64bit of a BAR that EPF drivers
are not allow to touch.
Drop the only_64bit property from hardware descriptions that are of type
reserved BAR.
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The hardware description for BARs is scattered in many different variables
in pci_epc_features. Some of these things are mutually exclusive, so it
can create confusion over which variable that has precedence over another.
Improve the situation by creating a struct pci_epc_bar_desc, and a new
enum pci_epc_bar_type, and convert the endpoint controller drivers to use
this more well defined format.
Additionally, some endpoint controller drivers mark the BAR succeeding a
"64-bit only BAR" as reserved, while some do not. By definition, a 64-bit
BAR uses the succeeding BAR for the upper 32-bits, so an EPF driver cannot
use a BAR succeeding a 64-bit BAR. Ensure that all endpoint controller
drivers are uniform, and actually describe a reserved BAR as reserved.
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
- Rename PCI_IRQ_LEGACY to PCI_IRQ_INTX to be more explicit and match spec
terminology (Bjorn Helgaas)
- Use existing PCI_IRQ_INTX, PCI_IRQ_MSI, PCI_IRQ_MSIX in artpec6, cadence,
designware, designware-plat, dra7xx, imx6, keembay, keystone, layerscape,
mhi, ntb, qcom, rcar, rcar-gen4, rockchip, tegra194, uniphier, vntb; drop
the redundant pci_epc_irq_type enum with the same values (Damien Le Moal)
- Use "intx" instead of "leg" or "legacy" when describing INTx interrupts
in endpoint core, endpoint tests, cadence, dra7xx, designware,
dw-rockchip, dwc core, imx6, keystone, layerscape, qcom, rcar-gen4,
rockchip, tegra194, uniphier, xilinx-nwl (Damien Le Moal)
* pci/irq-clean-up:
PCI: xilinx-nwl: Use INTX instead of legacy
PCI: rockchip-host: Rename rockchip_pcie_legacy_int_handler()
PCI: rockchip-ep: Use INTX instead of legacy
PCI: uniphier: Use INTX instead of legacy
PCI: tegra194: Use INTX instead of legacy
PCI: dw-rockchip: Rename rockchip_pcie_legacy_int_handler()
PCI: keystone: Use INTX instead of legacy
PCI: dwc: Rename dw_pcie_ep_raise_legacy_irq()
PCI: cadence: Use INTX instead of legacy
PCI: dra7xx: Rename dra7xx_pcie_raise_legacy_irq()
misc: pci_endpoint_test: Use INTX instead of LEGACY
PCI: endpoint: Rename LEGACY to INTX in test function driver
PCI: endpoint: Use INTX instead of legacy
PCI: endpoint: Drop PCI_EPC_IRQ_XXX definitions
PCI: Rename PCI_IRQ_LEGACY to PCI_IRQ_INTX
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
In the Designware uniphier controller driver, including the endpoint
driver, change all names using "legacy" to use "intx", to match the
term used in the PCI specifications.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
linux/pci.h defines the IRQ flags PCI_IRQ_INTX, PCI_IRQ_MSI and
PCI_IRQ_MSIX. Let's use these flags directly instead of the endpoint
definitions provided by enum pci_epc_irq_type. This removes the need
for defining this enum type completely.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Serge Semin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since the name of the dw_pcie_ep_ops struct makes it obvious that it's
for the PCIe Endpoint, rename the struct member .ep_init to .init.
[kwilczynski: commit log]
Suggested-by: Serge Semin <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Serge Semin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Srikanth Thokala <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus. As
part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they "temporarily"
include each other. They also include platform_device.h and of.h. As a
result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include files used
throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and replace the
implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to explicitly
include the correct includes.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add basic support for UniPhier NX1 SoC as non-legacy SoC. This includes
a compatible string, SoC-dependent data containing init() and wait()
functions for the controller.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Define SoC data structure that includes pci_epc_features, SoC-dependent
callback functions and flags to distinguish the behavior of each SoC.
The callback functions define init() to initialize the controller and
wait() to wait until initialization is completed.
Rename uniphier_pcie_init_ep() to uniphier_pcie_pro5_init_ep() for
initializing PCIe controller implemented in Pro5 SoC. And Pro5 SoC
doesn't have wait() function.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Most DWC drivers use the common register resource names "dbi", "dbi2", and
"addr_space", so let's move their setup into the DWC common code.
This means 'dbi_base' in particular is setup later, but it looks like no
drivers touch DBI registers before dw_pcie_host_init or dw_pcie_ep_init.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jingoo Han <[email protected]>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <[email protected]>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
Cc: Murali Karicheri <[email protected]>
Cc: Minghuan Lian <[email protected]>
Cc: Mingkai Hu <[email protected]>
Cc: Roy Zang <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonathan Chocron <[email protected]>
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <[email protected]>
Cc: Gustavo Pimentel <[email protected]>
Cc: Xiaowei Song <[email protected]>
Cc: Binghui Wang <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Gross <[email protected]>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
Cc: Stanimir Varbanov <[email protected]>
Cc: Pratyush Anand <[email protected]>
Cc: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: Kunihiko Hayashi <[email protected]>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
|
|
|
Add driver for the Socionext UniPhier Pro5 SoC endpoint controller.
This controller is based on the DesignWare PCIe core.
And add "host" to existing controller descriontions for the host controller
in Kconfig.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
|
