Merge 6.15-rc6 into char-misc-next

We need the iio/hyperv fixes in here as well.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 14 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index acf19b0042bb..f45ded62b0e0 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -536,14 +536,18 @@ void cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_disable_fast_switch);
 
 static unsigned int __resolve_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-		unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation)
+				   unsigned int target_freq,
+				   unsigned int min, unsigned int max,
+				   unsigned int relation)
 {
 	unsigned int idx;
 
+	target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, min, max);
+
 	if (!policy->freq_table)
 		return target_freq;
 
-	idx = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, target_freq, relation);
+	idx = cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, target_freq, min, max, relation);
 	policy->cached_resolved_idx = idx;
 	policy->cached_target_freq = target_freq;
 	return policy->freq_table[idx].frequency;
@@ -577,8 +581,7 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	if (unlikely(min > max))
 		min = max;
 
-	return __resolve_freq(policy, clamp_val(target_freq, min, max),
-			      CPUFREQ_RELATION_LE);
+	return __resolve_freq(policy, target_freq, min, max, CPUFREQ_RELATION_LE);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq);
 
@@ -2397,8 +2400,8 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	if (cpufreq_disabled())
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max);
-	target_freq = __resolve_freq(policy, target_freq, relation);
+	target_freq = __resolve_freq(policy, target_freq, policy->min,
+				     policy->max, relation);
 
 	pr_debug("target for CPU %u: %u kHz, relation %u, requested %u kHz\n",
 		 policy->cpu, target_freq, relation, old_target_freq);
@@ -2727,8 +2730,11 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	 * compiler optimizations around them because they may be accessed
 	 * concurrently by cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() during the update.
 	 */
-	WRITE_ONCE(policy->max, __resolve_freq(policy, new_data.max, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H));
-	new_data.min = __resolve_freq(policy, new_data.min, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
+	WRITE_ONCE(policy->max, __resolve_freq(policy, new_data.max,
+					       new_data.min, new_data.max,
+					       CPUFREQ_RELATION_H));
+	new_data.min = __resolve_freq(policy, new_data.min, new_data.min,
+				      new_data.max, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
 	WRITE_ONCE(policy->min, new_data.min > policy->max ? policy->max : new_data.min);
 
 	trace_cpu_frequency_limits(policy);