| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports:
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-imx1.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-imx27.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-intel-lgm.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/pwm/pwm-visconti.o
Add the missing invocations of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro.
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This prepares the pwm-visconti driver to further changes of the pwm core
outlined in the commit introducing devm_pwmchip_alloc(). There is no
intended semantical change and the driver should behave as before.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/24e779de69365686bb004742cd8f07cbda131212.1707900770.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of requiring each driver to care for assigning the owner member
of struct pwm_ops, handle that implicitly using a macro. Note that the
owner member has to be moved to struct pwm_chip, as the ops structure
usually lives in read-only memory and so cannot be modified.
The upside is that new low level drivers cannot forget the assignment and
save one line each. The pwm-crc driver didn't assign .owner, that's not
a problem in practice though as the driver cannot be compiled as a
module.
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> # Intel LPSS
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]> # pwm-{bcm,brcm}*.c
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]> # sun4i
Acked-by: Andi Shyti <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]> # pwm-visconti
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <[email protected]> # pwm-rockchip
Acked-by: Michael Walle <[email protected]> # pwm-sl28cpld
Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <[email protected]> # pwm-meson
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
.get_state() might fail in some cases. To make it possible that a driver
signals such a failure change the prototype of .get_state() to return an
error code.
This patch was created using coccinelle and the following semantic patch:
@p1@
identifier getstatefunc;
identifier driver;
@@
struct pwm_ops driver = {
...,
.get_state = getstatefunc
,...
};
@p2@
identifier p1.getstatefunc;
identifier chip, pwm, state;
@@
-void
+int
getstatefunc(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, struct pwm_state *state)
{
...
- return;
+ return 0;
...
}
plus the actual change of the prototype in include/linux/pwm.h (plus some
manual fixing of indentions and empty lines).
So for now all drivers return success unconditionally. They are adapted
in the following patches to make the changes easier reviewable.
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dave Stevenson <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows to drop the platform_driver's remove function. This is the
only user of driver data so this can go away, too.
Signed-off-by: zhaoxiao <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With the original code a request for period = 65536000 ns and period =
32768000 ns yields the same register settings (which results in 32768000
ns) because the value for pwmc0 was miscalculated.
Also simplify using that fls(0) is 0.
Fixes: 721b595744f1 ("pwm: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti SoC PWM support")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
|
|
|
Add driver for the PWM controller on Toshiba Visconti ARM SoC.
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
[[email protected]: fix up a couple of checkpatch warnings]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
|