diff options
| author | Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> | 2024-12-10 18:24:58 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> | 2024-12-10 18:24:58 +0000 |
| commit | cf8b876363da4fccdcc4ba209d4d098ec0f1ffac (patch) | |
| tree | a4aa5f75e63d21ae80e67b2cd0c56fa1e0eb4b7d /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/changes_pkt_data.c | |
| parent | bpf,perf: Fix invalid prog_array access in perf_event_detach_bpf_prog (diff) | |
| parent | selftests/bpf: validate that tail call invalidates packet pointers (diff) | |
| download | kernel-cf8b876363da4fccdcc4ba209d4d098ec0f1ffac.tar.gz kernel-cf8b876363da4fccdcc4ba209d4d098ec0f1ffac.zip | |
Merge branch 'bpf-track-changes_pkt_data-property-for-global-functions'
Eduard Zingerman says:
====================
bpf: track changes_pkt_data property for global functions
Nick Zavaritsky reported [0] a bug in verifier, where the following
unsafe program is not rejected:
__attribute__((__noinline__))
long skb_pull_data(struct __sk_buff *sk, __u32 len)
{
return bpf_skb_pull_data(sk, len);
}
SEC("tc")
int test_invalidate_checks(struct __sk_buff *sk)
{
int *p = (void *)(long)sk->data;
if ((void *)(p + 1) > (void *)(long)sk->data_end) return TCX_DROP;
skb_pull_data(sk, 0);
/* not safe, p is invalid after bpf_skb_pull_data call */
*p = 42;
return TCX_PASS;
}
This happens because verifier does not track package invalidation
effect of global sub-programs.
This patch-set fixes the issue by modifying check_cfg() to compute
whether or not each sub-program calls (directly or indirectly)
helper invalidating packet pointers.
As global functions could be replaced with extension programs,
a new field 'changes_pkt_data' is added to struct bpf_prog_aux.
Verifier only allows replacing functions that do not change packet
data with functions that do not change packet data.
In case if there is a need to a have a global function that does not
change packet data, but allow replacing it with function that does,
the recommendation is to add a noop call to a helper, e.g.:
- for skb do 'bpf_skb_change_proto(skb, 0, 0)';
- for xdp do 'bpf_xdp_adjust_meta(xdp, 0)'.
Functions also can do tail calls. Effects of the tail call cannot be
analyzed before-hand, thus verifier assumes that tail calls always
change packet data.
Changes v1 [1] -> v2:
- added handling of extension programs and tail calls
(thanks, Alexei, for all the input).
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
====================
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/changes_pkt_data.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/changes_pkt_data.c | 76 |
1 files changed, 76 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/changes_pkt_data.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/changes_pkt_data.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..c0c7202f6c5c --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/changes_pkt_data.c @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +#include "bpf/libbpf.h" +#include "changes_pkt_data_freplace.skel.h" +#include "changes_pkt_data.skel.h" +#include <test_progs.h> + +static void print_verifier_log(const char *log) +{ + if (env.verbosity >= VERBOSE_VERY) + fprintf(stdout, "VERIFIER LOG:\n=============\n%s=============\n", log); +} + +static void test_aux(const char *main_prog_name, const char *freplace_prog_name, bool expect_load) +{ + struct changes_pkt_data_freplace *freplace = NULL; + struct bpf_program *freplace_prog = NULL; + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts); + struct changes_pkt_data *main = NULL; + char log[16*1024]; + int err; + + opts.kernel_log_buf = log; + opts.kernel_log_size = sizeof(log); + if (env.verbosity >= VERBOSE_SUPER) + opts.kernel_log_level = 1 | 2 | 4; + main = changes_pkt_data__open_opts(&opts); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(main, "changes_pkt_data__open")) + goto out; + err = changes_pkt_data__load(main); + print_verifier_log(log); + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "changes_pkt_data__load")) + goto out; + freplace = changes_pkt_data_freplace__open_opts(&opts); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(freplace, "changes_pkt_data_freplace__open")) + goto out; + freplace_prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(freplace->obj, freplace_prog_name); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(freplace_prog, "freplace_prog")) + goto out; + bpf_program__set_autoload(freplace_prog, true); + bpf_program__set_autoattach(freplace_prog, true); + bpf_program__set_attach_target(freplace_prog, + bpf_program__fd(main->progs.dummy), + main_prog_name); + err = changes_pkt_data_freplace__load(freplace); + print_verifier_log(log); + if (expect_load) { + ASSERT_OK(err, "changes_pkt_data_freplace__load"); + } else { + ASSERT_ERR(err, "changes_pkt_data_freplace__load"); + ASSERT_HAS_SUBSTR(log, "Extension program changes packet data", "error log"); + } + +out: + changes_pkt_data_freplace__destroy(freplace); + changes_pkt_data__destroy(main); +} + +/* There are two global subprograms in both changes_pkt_data.skel.h: + * - one changes packet data; + * - another does not. + * It is ok to freplace subprograms that change packet data with those + * that either do or do not. It is only ok to freplace subprograms + * that do not change packet data with those that do not as well. + * The below tests check outcomes for each combination of such freplace. + */ +void test_changes_pkt_data_freplace(void) +{ + if (test__start_subtest("changes_with_changes")) + test_aux("changes_pkt_data", "changes_pkt_data", true); + if (test__start_subtest("changes_with_doesnt_change")) + test_aux("changes_pkt_data", "does_not_change_pkt_data", true); + if (test__start_subtest("doesnt_change_with_changes")) + test_aux("does_not_change_pkt_data", "changes_pkt_data", false); + if (test__start_subtest("doesnt_change_with_doesnt_change")) + test_aux("does_not_change_pkt_data", "does_not_change_pkt_data", true); +} |
