perf annotate: Remove hist__account_cycles() from callback

The hist__account_cycles() function is executed when the
hist_iter__branch_callback() is called.

But it looks it's not necessary.  In hist__account_cycles, it already
walks on all branch entries.

This patch moves the hist__account_cycles out of callback, now the data
processing is much faster than before.

Previous code has an issue that the ch[offset].num++ (in
__symbol__account_cycles) is executed repeatedly since
hist__account_cycles is called in each hist_iter__branch_callback, so
the counting of ch[offset].num is not correct (too big).

With this patch, the issue is fixed. And we don't need the code of
"ch->reset >= ch->num / 2" to check if there are too many overlaps (in
annotation__count_and_fill), otherwise some data would be hidden.

Now, we can try, for example:

  perf record -b ...
  perf annotate or perf report -s symbol

The before/after output should be no change.

 v3:
 ---
 Fix the crash in stdio mode.
 Like previous code, it needs the checking of ui__has_annotation()
 before hist__account_cycles()

 v2:
 ---
 1. Cover the similar perf report
 2. Remove the checking code "ch->reset >= ch->num / 2"

Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Jin Yao <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Kan Liang <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
index 67f9d9ffacfb..77deb3a40596 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
@@ -159,8 +159,6 @@ static int hist_iter__branch_callback(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
 	struct perf_evsel *evsel = iter->evsel;
 	int err;
 
-	hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample, false);
-
 	bi = he->branch_info;
 	err = addr_map_symbol__inc_samples(&bi->from, sample, evsel);
 
@@ -199,6 +197,8 @@ static int process_branch_callback(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
 	if (a.map != NULL)
 		a.map->dso->hit = 1;
 
+	hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample, false);
+
 	ret = hist_entry_iter__add(&iter, &a, PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH, ann);
 	return ret;
 }