diff options
| author | Mukesh Ojha <[email protected]> | 2025-07-08 07:58:38 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Walleij <[email protected]> | 2025-07-11 18:19:55 +0000 |
| commit | 0b075c011032f88d1cfde3b45d6dcf08b44140eb (patch) | |
| tree | a03a3a30d8c464f9ac8ce54c4f19323af973500b /rust/helpers | |
| parent | Merge tag 'renesas-pinctrl-for-v6.17-tag2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/li... (diff) | |
| download | kernel-0b075c011032f88d1cfde3b45d6dcf08b44140eb.tar.gz kernel-0b075c011032f88d1cfde3b45d6dcf08b44140eb.zip | |
pinmux: fix race causing mux_owner NULL with active mux_usecount
commit 5a3e85c3c397 ("pinmux: Use sequential access to access
desc->pinmux data") tried to address the issue when two client of the
same gpio calls pinctrl_select_state() for the same functionality, was
resulting in NULL pointer issue while accessing desc->mux_owner.
However, issue was not completely fixed due to the way it was handled
and it can still result in the same NULL pointer.
The issue occurs due to the following interleaving:
cpu0 (process A) cpu1 (process B)
pin_request() { pin_free() {
mutex_lock()
desc->mux_usecount--; //becomes 0
..
mutex_unlock()
mutex_lock(desc->mux)
desc->mux_usecount++; // becomes 1
desc->mux_owner = owner;
mutex_unlock(desc->mux)
mutex_lock(desc->mux)
desc->mux_owner = NULL;
mutex_unlock(desc->mux)
This sequence leads to a state where the pin appears to be in use
(`mux_usecount == 1`) but has no owner (`mux_owner == NULL`), which can
cause NULL pointer on next pin_request on the same pin.
Ensure that updates to mux_usecount and mux_owner are performed
atomically under the same lock. Only clear mux_owner when mux_usecount
reaches zero and no new owner has been assigned.
Fixes: 5a3e85c3c397 ("pinmux: Use sequential access to access desc->pinmux data")
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'rust/helpers')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
