x86/its: Add support for ITS-safe return thunk

RETs in the lower half of cacheline may be affected by ITS bug,
specifically when the RSB-underflows. Use ITS-safe return thunk for such
RETs.

RETs that are not patched:

- RET in retpoline sequence does not need to be patched, because the
  sequence itself fills an RSB before RET.
- RET in Call Depth Tracking (CDT) thunks __x86_indirect_{call|jump}_thunk
  and call_depth_return_thunk are not patched because CDT by design
  prevents RSB-underflow.
- RETs in .init section are not reachable after init.
- RETs that are explicitly marked safe with ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE.

Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 01e8119db5db..a5b65c09910b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ static void emit_return(u8 **pprog, u8 *ip)
 {
 	u8 *prog = *pprog;
 
-	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK)) {
+	if (cpu_wants_rethunk()) {
 		emit_jump(&prog, x86_return_thunk, ip);
 	} else {
 		EMIT1(0xC3);		/* ret */