From 999d25d47d45a0f594c84d51c041da0b24d68c5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Werner Koch Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 14:54:10 +0200 Subject: Do not use the pinentry's qualitybar * agent/genkey.c (agent_ask_new_passphrase): No qualitybar. * g10/call-agent.c (agent_get_passphrase): Ditto. * sm/call-agent.c (gpgsm_agent_ask_passphrase): Ditto. -- The concept of a passphrase quality indicator is anyway questionable because user are smart enough to trick them out and they also tend to limit the actually used entropy. Except for the red/green switching (to show whether constraints are fulfilled) our qualitybar is pretty bad and thus worse than none. Signed-off-by: Werner Koch --- sm/call-agent.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'sm/call-agent.c') diff --git a/sm/call-agent.c b/sm/call-agent.c index 9287091bc..5f0e8ed61 100644 --- a/sm/call-agent.c +++ b/sm/call-agent.c @@ -1322,7 +1322,7 @@ gpgsm_agent_ask_passphrase (ctrl_t ctrl, const char *desc_msg, int repeat, return gpg_error_from_syserror (); snprintf (line, DIM(line), "GET_PASSPHRASE --data%s -- X X X %s", - repeat? " --repeat=1 --check --qualitybar":"", + repeat? " --repeat=1 --check":"", arg4); xfree (arg4); -- cgit