44ba56ca73
* autogen.sh: Invoke automake with `-a' (add missing files). Do not invoke configure.
53 lines
1.8 KiB
Plaintext
53 lines
1.8 KiB
Plaintext
* Implement posix-sema.c
|
|
|
|
* Allow to use GTK's main loop instead of the select stuff in
|
|
wait.c
|
|
|
|
* add locking to the key cache?
|
|
|
|
* Should --delete silently delete secret keys or is there a need for
|
|
another flag or a callback?
|
|
|
|
* GpgmeKey misses GPGME_ATTR_EXPIRE attribute
|
|
|
|
* Add ATTR to return the number of subkeys or uids.
|
|
|
|
* Return GPGME_Canceled when appropriate
|
|
|
|
* Implement decrypt+verify
|
|
|
|
* Tests
|
|
** t-data
|
|
*** Test gpgme_data_write and gpgme_data_release_and_get_mem.
|
|
*** Test gpgme_data_rewind for invalid types.
|
|
*** Test gpgme_data_read's readable feature.
|
|
|
|
Bugs reported by Stephane Corthesy:
|
|
> - When asking a GpgmeKey for one of its sub-userIDs (index > 0)
|
|
> GPGME_ATTR_EMAIL attribute, it returns the name + email, whereas for
|
|
> the main (index = 0) userID it returns only the email.
|
|
|
|
> - When returning a GpgmeKey GPGME_ATTR_COMMENT attribute, characters
|
|
> like ":" are not un-escaped, they are returned as \x3a
|
|
|
|
> - When asking a GpgmeKey its main userID (index = 0), it returns the
|
|
> last userID it was asked (can be a sub, or the main).
|
|
|
|
> BTW, here's another bug: it it not possible to retrieve fingerprints
|
|
> for subkeys
|
|
|
|
> In GpgmeRecipients, would it be possible to provide a function which
|
|
> would return the validity assigned to a name contained in the
|
|
> GpgmeRecipients instance?
|
|
|
|
> - There is an inconsistent behaviour: if we pass three times an
|
|
> invalid (but non empty) passphrase, return code is GPGME_No_Data, but
|
|
> if we pass three times an empty (and invalid) passphrase, we get
|
|
> GPGME_No_Passphrase.
|
|
|
|
> passphrase callback. If I use the same GpgmeContext as the one which
|
|
> is currently asking for a passphrase, my app crashes: the r_hd in
|
|
> the
|
|
> callback has become invalid; if I use a brand new one, the callback
|
|
> is called recursively, when I ask to enumerate keys.
|