aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lang/python/doc/rst/maintenance-mode.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lang/python/doc/rst/maintenance-mode.rst')
-rw-r--r--lang/python/doc/rst/maintenance-mode.rst133
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 133 deletions
diff --git a/lang/python/doc/rst/maintenance-mode.rst b/lang/python/doc/rst/maintenance-mode.rst
deleted file mode 100644
index 6f770bc6..00000000
--- a/lang/python/doc/rst/maintenance-mode.rst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,133 +0,0 @@
-.. _maintenance-mode:
-
-Maintenance Mode from 2019
-==========================
-
-+-----------------+------------------------------------------+
-| Version: | 0.0.1 |
-+-----------------+------------------------------------------+
-| GPGME Version: | 1.13.0 |
-+-----------------+------------------------------------------+
-| Author: | Ben McGinnes <[email protected]> |
-+-----------------+------------------------------------------+
-| Author GPG Key: | DB4724E6FA4286C92B4E55C4321E4E2373590E5D |
-+-----------------+------------------------------------------+
-| Language: | Australian English, British English |
-+-----------------+------------------------------------------+
-| xml:lang: | en-AU, en-GB, en |
-+-----------------+------------------------------------------+
-
-From the beginning of 2019 the Python bindings to GPGME will enter
-maintenance mode, meaning that new features will not be added and only
-bug fixes and security fixes will be made. This also means that
-documentation beyond that existing at the end of 2018 will not be
-developed further except to correct errors.
-
-Though use of these bindings appears to have been quite well received,
-there has been no indication of what demand there is, if any for either
-financial backing of the current Python bindings development or support
-contracts with g10code GmbH citing the necessity of including the
-bindings.
-
-.. _maintenance-mode-bm:
-
-Maintainer from 2019 onward
----------------------------
-
-How does this affect the position of GnuPG Python Bindings Maintainer?
-
-Well, I will remain as maintainer of the bindings; but without funding
-for that position, the amount of time I will be able to dedicate solely
-to this task will be limited and reduced to volunteered time. As with
-all volunteered time and effort in free software projects, this will be
-subject to numerous external imperatives.
-
-.. _maintenance-mode-blade-runner:
-
-Using the Python Bindings from 2019 and beyond
-----------------------------------------------
-
-For most, if not all, Python developers using these bindings; they will
-continue to "just work" the same as they always have. Expansions of
-GPGME itself are usually handled by SWIG with the existing code and thus
-bindings are generated properly when the bindings are installed
-alongside GPGME and when the latter is built from source.
-
-In the rare circumstances where that is not enough to address some new
-addition to GPGME, then that is a bug and thus subject to the
-maintenance mode provisions (i.e. it will be fixed following a bug
-report being raised and your humble author will need to remember where
-the timesheet template was filed, depending on how many years off such
-an event is).
-
-All the GPGME functionality will continue to be accessible via the lower
-level, dynamically generated methods which match the GPGME C
-documentation. While the more intuitively Pythonic higher level layer
-already covers the vast majority of functionality people require with
-key generation, signatures, certifications (key signing), encryption,
-decryption, verification, validation, trust levels and so on.
-
-Any wanted features lacking in the Python bindings are usually lacking
-because they are missing from GPGME itself (e.g. revoking keys via the
-API) and in such cases they are usually deliberately excluded. More
-discussion of these issues can be found in the archives of the
-`gnupg-devel mailing
-list <https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel>`__.
-
-Any features existing in the dynamically generated layer for which
-people want a specific, higher level function included to make it more
-Pythonic (e.g. to avoid needing to learn or memorise cryptographic mode
-values or GnuPG status code numbers), would be a feature request and
-*not* a bug.
-
-It is still worthwhile requesting it, but the addition of such a feature
-would not be guaranteed and provided on a purely volunteer basis.
-Expediting such a request would require funding that request.
-
-Those with a commercial interest in expediting such a feature request
-already know how to `expedite
-it <https://gnupg.org/cgi-bin/procdonate.cgi?mode=preset>`__ (use the
-message field to state what feature is being requested).
-
-.. _docs:
-
-Documentation formats
----------------------
-
-The documentation has been written in Org mode for GNU Emacs, with both
-Texinfo and reStructuredText formats generated from that. The Texinfo
-files are intended for use with the rest of the GnuPG documentation;
-while the reStructuredText files are intended for use with Docutils and
-Sphinx, as with other Python projects.
-
-.. _sphinx-made-epubs-suck:
-
-Cautionary Notes regarding Sphinx and EPUB
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-Though Python\'s Docutils in conjunction with Sphinx is capable of
-generating some very useful HTML sites, as proven by `Read the
-Docs <https://readthedocs.org/>`__ and the `Python
-documentation <https://docs.python.org/>`__, there are a number of
-output formats it does not handle well. At the top of the list of things
-it manages to break so atrociously as to be embarassing is the `EPUB
-3 <http://idpf.org/epub>`__ format.
-
-The automatically generated EPUB of the CPython documentation always
-contains hundreds of validation errors and even the modest amount of
-documentation here `produced a
-file <https://files.au.adversary.org.s3.amazonaws.com/crypto/gpgme-python/rst/epub/GPGMEPythonBindings.epub>`__
-with approximately thirty validation errors. As the volume of
-documentation content increases, so does the induced errors. Whereas
-Texinfo doesn\'t produce EPUB output at all, nor does Org-mode.
-
-Should there ever be genuine demand for this format, lodge a `feature
-request <https://dev.gnupg.org/maniphest/task/edit/form/4/>`__ case
-marked for `my <https://dev.gnupg.org/p/BenM/>`__ attention. The means
-of generating such files flawlessly is already available, but is not yet
-part of the GnuPG build system. Nor is it integrated with a means of
-converting Org mode input files to the relevant base format
-automatically, as can already be done when converting Org to
-reStructuredText or Org to Texinfo. As a certain amount of work would be
-required to get it done, there would need to be clear demand for that
-work to be done.