Update some items.

This commit is contained in:
Marcus Brinkmann 2002-02-06 01:30:27 +00:00
parent 4d40fcd82e
commit a758f4c718

27
TODO
View File

@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ Hey Emacs, this is -*- outline -*- mode!
which can not be differentiated from the case that it is not
representable.
* Implement posix-sema.c
* Allow to use GTK's main loop instead of the select stuff in
wait.c
@ -14,10 +12,6 @@ Hey Emacs, this is -*- outline -*- mode!
* GpgmeKey misses GPGME_ATTR_EXPIRE attribute
* Add ATTR to return the number of subkeys or uids.
* Factor out common code in _op_*_start functions.
* Documentation
** Add note about GPGME clearing out pointer return values.
** validity/trust
@ -31,10 +25,20 @@ Hey Emacs, this is -*- outline -*- mode!
** Export status handler need much more work.
** Import should return a useful error when one happened.
** Genkey should return something more useful than General_Error.
** Factor out common code in _op_*_start functions.
** Add ATTR to return the number of subkeys or uids.
** "When returning a GpgmeKey GPGME_ATTR_COMMENT attribute, characters
like ":" are not un-escaped, they are returned as \x3a" Bug
reported by Stephane Corthesy.
* Error Values
** Map ASSUAN/GpgSM ERR error values in a better way than is done now.
** Verify (and document) if Read_Error, Write_Error, Pipe_Error set errno.
** "There is an inconsistent behaviour: if we pass three times an
invalid (but non empty) passphrase, return code is GPGME_No_Data,
but if we pass three times an empty (and invalid) passphrase, we
get GPGME_No_Passphrase." Bug reported by Stephane Corthesy.
* Tests
** t-data
@ -47,10 +51,10 @@ Hey Emacs, this is -*- outline -*- mode!
** There is a spurious 4/10 tests failed in some conditions.
Rebuilding from scratch works around that.
Bugs reported by Stephane Corthesy:
> - When returning a GpgmeKey GPGME_ATTR_COMMENT attribute, characters
> like ":" are not un-escaped, they are returned as \x3a
* Architecture support
** Implement posix-sema.c
Bugs reported by Stephane Corthesy:
> BTW, here's another bug: it it not possible to retrieve fingerprints
> for subkeys
@ -58,11 +62,6 @@ Bugs reported by Stephane Corthesy:
> would return the validity assigned to a name contained in the
> GpgmeRecipients instance?
> - There is an inconsistent behaviour: if we pass three times an
> invalid (but non empty) passphrase, return code is GPGME_No_Data, but
> if we pass three times an empty (and invalid) passphrase, we get
> GPGME_No_Passphrase.
> passphrase callback. If I use the same GpgmeContext as the one which
> is currently asking for a passphrase, my app crashes: the r_hd in
> the