GpgFrontend/gpgme
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fixed funopen test change.

Browse Source 
Hey, Moritz what was the orginal problem?  Does autoconf not anymore
allow to put AC_LIBOBJ into AC_CEHCK_FUNCS?
This commit is contained in:
Werner Koch 2004-02-10 10:10:40 +00:00
parent a4bbdd6cbd
commit 867df1aa04
2 changed files with 6 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
2004-02-10 Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
* configure.ac: Fixed funopen test change.
2004-02-06 Moritz Schulte <mo@g10code.com> 2004-02-06 Moritz Schulte <mo@g10code.com>
* configure.ac: Fix funopen replacement mechanism. * configure.ac: Fix funopen replacement mechanism.

3
configure.ac
View File

@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ AC_PREREQ(2.57)
min_automake_version="1.7.6" min_automake_version="1.7.6"
# Version number: Remember to change it immediately *after* a release. # Version number: Remember to change it immediately *after* a release.
AC_INIT(gpgme, 0.4.4, [bug-gpgme@gnupg.org]) AC_INIT(gpgme, 0.4.5-cvs, [bug-gpgme@gnupg.org])
# LT Version numbers, remember to change them just *before* a release. # LT Version numbers, remember to change them just *before* a release.
# (Code changed: REVISION++) # (Code changed: REVISION++)
# (Interfaces added/removed/changed: CURRENT++, REVISION=0) # (Interfaces added/removed/changed: CURRENT++, REVISION=0)
@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ if test "$GPGSM" != "no"; then
AC_CHECK_FUNCS(funopen) AC_CHECK_FUNCS(funopen)
if test $ac_cv_func_funopen != yes; then if test $ac_cv_func_funopen != yes; then
# No funopen but we can implement that in terms of fopencookie. # No funopen but we can implement that in terms of fopencookie.
AC_CHECK_FUNCS(fopencookie)
if test $ac_cv_func_fopencookie = yes; then if test $ac_cv_func_fopencookie = yes; then
AC_LIBOBJ([funopen]) AC_LIBOBJ([funopen])
else else