Fixed funopen test change.
Hey, Moritz what was the orginal problem? Does autoconf not anymore allow to put AC_LIBOBJ into AC_CEHCK_FUNCS?
This commit is contained in:
parent
a4bbdd6cbd
commit
867df1aa04
@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
|
||||
2004-02-10 Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
|
||||
|
||||
* configure.ac: Fixed funopen test change.
|
||||
|
||||
2004-02-06 Moritz Schulte <mo@g10code.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* configure.ac: Fix funopen replacement mechanism.
|
||||
|
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ AC_PREREQ(2.57)
|
||||
min_automake_version="1.7.6"
|
||||
|
||||
# Version number: Remember to change it immediately *after* a release.
|
||||
AC_INIT(gpgme, 0.4.4, [bug-gpgme@gnupg.org])
|
||||
AC_INIT(gpgme, 0.4.5-cvs, [bug-gpgme@gnupg.org])
|
||||
# LT Version numbers, remember to change them just *before* a release.
|
||||
# (Code changed: REVISION++)
|
||||
# (Interfaces added/removed/changed: CURRENT++, REVISION=0)
|
||||
@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ if test "$GPGSM" != "no"; then
|
||||
AC_CHECK_FUNCS(funopen)
|
||||
if test $ac_cv_func_funopen != yes; then
|
||||
# No funopen but we can implement that in terms of fopencookie.
|
||||
AC_CHECK_FUNCS(fopencookie)
|
||||
if test $ac_cv_func_fopencookie = yes; then
|
||||
AC_LIBOBJ([funopen])
|
||||
else
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user