From e5a79b2da81bd01562cd6c469eb106f765f43269 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 13:55:41 +0000
Subject: See ChangeLog: Tue May  4 15:49:29 CEST 1999  Werner Koch

---
 doc/FAQ | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'doc/FAQ')

diff --git a/doc/FAQ b/doc/FAQ
index 97bf94a05..b008f2ce7 100644
--- a/doc/FAQ
+++ b/doc/FAQ
@@ -81,7 +81,8 @@
     signatures this is sufficient as the size of the hash
     is probably the weakest link if the keysize is larger
     than 1024 bits.  Encryption keys may have greater sizes,
-    but you should than check the fingerprint of this key.
+    but you should than check the fingerprint of this key:
+    "gpg --fingerprint --fingerprint <user ID>".
 
  Q: Why are some signatures with an ELG-E key valid?
  A: These are ElGamal Key generated by GNUPG in v3 (rfc1991)
-- 
cgit v1.2.3