aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/doc/faq.raw
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/faq.raw')
-rw-r--r--doc/faq.raw1019
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1019 deletions
diff --git a/doc/faq.raw b/doc/faq.raw
deleted file mode 100644
index ec4212326..000000000
--- a/doc/faq.raw
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,1019 +0,0 @@
-[$htmltitle=GnuPG FAQ]
-[$sfaqheader=The GnuPG FAQ says:]
-[$sfaqfooter=
-The most recent version of the FAQ is available from
-<http://www.gnupg.org/>
-]
-[$usenetheader=
-]
-[$maintainer=David D. Scribner, <faq 'at' gnupg.org>]
-[$hGPG=http://www.gnupg.org]
-
-[H body bgcolor=#ffffff text=#000000 link=#1f00ff alink=#ff0000 vlink=#9900dd]
-[H H1]GnuPG Frequently Asked Questions[H /H1]
-
-
-[H p]
-Version: 1.5.7[H br]
-Last-Modified: Aug 21, 2002[H br]
-Maintained-by: [$maintainer]
-[H /p]
-
-
-This is the GnuPG FAQ. The latest HTML version is available
-[H a href=[$hGPG]/faq.html]here[H/a].
-
-The index is generated automatically, so there may be errors here. Not
-all questions may be in the section they belong to. Suggestions about
-how to improve the structure of this FAQ are welcome.
-
-Please send additions and corrections to the maintainer. It would be
-most convenient if you could provide the answer to be included here
-as well. Your help is very much appreciated.
-
-Please, don't send message like "This should be a FAQ - what's the answer?".
-If it hasn't been asked before, it isn't a FAQ. In that case you could
-search in the mailing list archive.
-
-[H HR]
-<C>
-[H HR]
-
-
-<S> GENERAL
-
-<Q> What is GnuPG?
-
- [H a href=[$hGPG]]GnuPG[H /a] stands for GNU Privacy Guard and
- is GNU's tool for secure communication and data storage. It can be
- used to encrypt data and to create digital signatures. It includes
- an advanced key management facility and is compliant with the
- proposed OpenPGP Internet standard as described in [H a href=http://www.gnupg.org/rfc2440.html]RFC 2440[H/a].
- As such, it is aimed to be compatible with PGP from NAI, Inc.
-
-<Q> Is GnuPG compatible with PGP?
-
- In general, yes. GnuPG and newer PGP releases should be implementing
- the OpenPGP standard. But there are some interoperability
- problems. See question <Rcompat> for details.
-
-
-<S> SOURCES of INFORMATION
-
-<Q> Where can I find more information?
-
- Here's a list of on-line resources:
-
- [H UL]
- [H LI]The documentation page is located at [H a href=[$hGPG]/docs.html]<[$hGPG]/docs.html>[H/a].
- Have a look at the HOWTOs and the GNU Privacy Handbook (GPH, available
- in English, Spanish and Russian). The latter provides a detailed user's
- guide to GnuPG. You'll also find a document about how to convert from
- PGP 2.x to GnuPG.
-
- [H LI]On [H a href=http://lists.gnupg.org]<http://lists.gnupg.org>[H/a] you'll find an online archive of the
- GnuPG mailing lists. Most interesting should be gnupg-users for all
- user-related issues and gnupg-devel if you want to get in touch with
- the developers.
-
- In addition, searchable archives can be found on MARC, e.g.: [H br]
- GnuPG-users: [H a href=http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gnupg-users&r=1&w=2]<http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gnupg-users&r=1&w=2>[H/a],[H br]
- GnuPG-devel: [H a href=http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gnupg-devel&r=1&w=2]<http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gnupg-devel&r=1&w=2>[H/a].[H br]
-
- [H B]PLEASE:[H/B]
- Before posting to a list, read this FAQ and the available
- documentation. In addition, search the list archive - maybe your
- question has already been discussed. This way you help people focus
- on topics that have not yet been resolved.
-
- [H LI]The GnuPG source distribution contains a subdirectory:
-
- [H PRE]
- ./doc
- [H /PRE]
-
- where some additional documentation is located (mainly interesting
- for hackers, not the casual user).
- [H /UL]
-
-<Q> Where do I get GnuPG?
-
- You can download the GNU Privacy Guard from its primary FTP server
- [H a href=ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/pub/gcrypt]ftp.gnupg.org[H /a] or from one of the mirrors:
-
- [H a href=[$hGPG]/mirrors.html]
- <[$hGPG]/mirror.html>
- [H /a]
-
- The current version is 1.0.4, please upgrade to this version as it
- fixes a security bug regarding the verification of multiple signatures.
-
-
-<S> INSTALLATION
-
-<Q> Which OSes does GnuPG run on?
-
- It should run on most Unices as well as Windows 95 and Windows NT. A
- list of OSes reported to be OK is presented at:
-
- [H a href=http://www.gnupg.org/backend.html#supsys]
- <http://www.gnupg.org/gnupg.html#supsys>
- [H /a]
-
-<Q> Which random gatherer should I use?
-
- "Good" random numbers are crucial for the security of your encryption.
- Different operating systems provide a variety of more or less quality
- random data. Linux and *BSD provide kernel generated random data
- through /dev/random - this should be the preferred choice on these
- systems. Also Solaris users with the SUNWski package installed have
- a /dev/random. In these cases, use the configure option:
-
- [H pre]
- --enable-static-rnd=linux
- [H/pre]
-
- In addition, there's also the kernel random device by Andi Maier
- [H a href= http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~andi]<http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~andi>[H /a], but it's still beta. Use at your
- own risk!
-
- On other systems, the Entropy Gathering Daemon (EGD) is a good choice.
- It is a perl-daemon that monitors system activity and hashes it into
- random data. See the download page [H a href=http://www.gnupg.org/download.html]<http://www.gnupg.org/download.html>[H /a]
- to obtain egd. Use:
-
- [H pre]
- --enable-static-rnd=egd
- [H/pre]
-
- here.
-
- If the above options do not work, you can use the random number
- generator "unix". This is [H B]very[H /B] slow and should be avoiced. The
- random quality isn't very good so don't use it on sensitive data.
-
-<Didea>
-<Q> How do I include support for RSA and IDEA?
-
- RSA is included as of GnuPG 1.0.3.
-
- The official GnuPG distribution does not contain IDEA due to a
- patent restriction. The patent does not expire before 2007 so don't
- expect official support before then.
-
- However, there is an unofficial module to include it even
- in earlier versions of GnuPG. It's available from
- [H a href=ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/pub/gcrypt/contrib/]<ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/pub/gcrypt/contrib/>[H /a]. Look for:
-
- [H pre]
- idea.c
- [H /pre]
-
- Compilation directives are in the headers of these files. Then add
- the following line to your ~/.gnupg/options:
-
- [H pre]
- load-extension idea
- [H /pre]
-
-
-<S> USAGE
-
-<Q> What is the recommended key size?
-
- 1024 bit for DSA signatures; even for plain ElGamal signatures
- this is sufficient as the size of the hash is probably the weakest
- link if the key size is larger than 1024 bits. Encryption keys may
- have greater sizes, but you should then check the fingerprint of
- this key:
-
- [H pre]
- gpg --fingerprint <user ID>
- [H /pre]
-
- As for the key algorithms, you should stick with the default (i.e.,
- DSA signature and ElGamal encryption). A ElGamal signing key has the
- following disadvantages: the signature is larger, it is hard to
- create such a key useful for signatures which can withstand some
- real world attacks, you don't get any extra security compared to
- DSA, and there might be compatibility problems with certain PGP
- versions. It has only been introduced because at the time it was
- not clear whether there was a patent on DSA.
-
-<Q> Why does it sometimes take so long to create keys?
-
- The problem here is that we need a lot of random bytes and for that
- we (on Linux the /dev/random device) must collect some random data.
- It is really not easy to fill the Linux internal entropy buffer; I
- talked to Ted Ts'o and he commented that the best way to fill the
- buffer is to play with your keyboard. Good security has its price.
- What I do is to hit several times on the shift, control, alternate,
- and caps lock keys, because these keys do not produce output to the
- screen. This way you get your keys really fast (it's the same thing
- PGP2 does).
-
- Another problem might be another program which eats up your random
- bytes (a program (look at your daemons) that reads from /dev/random).
-
-<Q> And it really takes long when I work on a remote system. Why?
-
- Don't do this at all! You should never create keys or even use GnuPG
- on a remote system because you normally have no physical control
- over your secret key ring (which is in most cases vulnerable to
- advanced dictionary attacks) - I strongly encourage everyone to only
- create keys on a local computer (a disconnected laptop is probably
- the best choice) and if you need it on your connected box (I know:
- We all do this) be sure to have a strong password for your account
- and for your secret key and that you can trust your system
- administrator.
-
- When I check GnuPG on a remote system via ssh (I have no Alpha here
- ;-) I have the same problem. It takes a *very* long time to create
- the keys, so I use a special option, --quick-random, to generate
- insecure keys which are only good for some tests.
-
-<Q> What is the difference between options and commands?
-
- If you do a 'gpg --help', you will get two separate lists. The first
- is a list of commands. The second is a list of options. Whenever you
- run GPG, you [H B]must[H /B] pick exactly one command (with one exception,
- see below). You [H B]may[H /B] pick one or more options. The command should,
- just by convention, come at the end of the argument list, after all
- the options. If the command takes a file (all the basic ones do),
- the filename comes at the very end. So the basic way to run gpg is:
-
- [H pre]
- gpg [--option something] [--option2] [--option3 something] --command file
- [H/pre]
-
- Some options take arguments. For example, the --output option (which
- can be abbreviated -o) is an option that takes a filename. The
- option's argument must follow immediately after the option itself,
- otherwise gpg doesn't know which option the argument is supposed to
- go with. As an option, --output and its filename must come before
- the command. The --recipient (-r) option takes a name or keyid to
- encrypt the message to, which must come right after the -r argument.
- The --encrypt (or -e) command comes after all the options followed
- by the file you wish to encrypt. So use:
-
- [H pre]
- gpg -r alice -o secret.txt -e test.txt
- [H/pre]
-
- If you write the options out in full, it is easier to read:
-
- [H pre]
- gpg --recipient alice --output secret.txt --encrypt test.txt
- [H/pre]
-
- If you're saving it in a file called ".txt" then you'd probably
- expect to see ASCII-armored text in there, so you need to add the
- --armor (-a) option, which doesn't take any arguments:
-
- [H pre]
- gpg --armor --recipient alice --output secret.txt --encrypt test.txt
- [H/pre]
-
- If you imagine square brackets around the optional parts, it becomes
- a bit clearer:
-
- [H pre]
- gpg [--armor] [--recipient alice] [--output secret.txt] --encrypt test.txt
- [H/pre]
-
- The optional parts can be rearranged any way you want:
-
- [H pre]
- gpg --output secret.txt --recipient alice --armor --encrypt test.txt
- [H/pre]
-
- If your filename begins with a hyphen (e.g. "-a.txt"), GnuPG assumes
- this is an option and may complain. To avoid this you have either
- to use "./-a.txt" or stop the option and command processing with two
- hyphens: "-- -a.txt". [H B]The exception:[H /B] signing and encrypting at the
- same time. Use:
-
- [H pre]
- gpg [--options] --sign --encrypt foo.txt
- [H/pre]
-
-<Q> I can't delete a user ID because it is already deleted on my public
- keyring?
-
- Because you can only select from the public key ring, there is no
- direct way to do this. However it is not very complicated to do
- anyway. Create a new user ID with exactly the same name and you
- will see that there are now two identical user IDs on the secret
- ring. Now select this user ID and delete it. Both user IDs will be
- removed from the secret ring.
-
-<Q> I can't delete the secret key because my public key disappeared?
-
- To select a key a search is always done on the public keyring,
- therefore it is not possible to select an secret key without
- having the public key. Normally it shoud never happen that the
- public key got lost but the secret key is still available. The
- reality is different, so GnuPG implements a special way to deal
- with it: Simply use the long keyid which can be obtained by using
- the --with-colons options (it is the fifth field in the lines
- beginning with "sec").
-
-<Q> What are trust, validity and ownertrust?
-
- "ownertrust" is used instead of "trust" to make clear that this is
- the value you have assigned to a key to express how much you trust
- the owner of this key to correctly sign (and so introduce) other
- keys. "validity", or calculated trust, is a value which says how
- much GnuPG thinks a key is valid (that it really belongs to the one
- who claims to be the owner of the key). For more see the chapter
- "The Web of Trust" in the Manual.
-
-<Q> How do I sign a patch file?
-
- Use "gpg --clearsign --not-dash-escaped ...". The problem with
- --clearsign is that all lines starting with a dash are quoted with
- "- "; obviously diff produces many lines starting with a dash and
- these are then quoted and that is not good for a patch ;-). To use a
- patch file without removing the cleartext signature, the special
- option --not-dash-escaped may be used to suppress generation of
- these escape sequences. You should not mail such a patch because
- spaces and line endings are also subject to the signature and a
- mailer may not preserve these. If you want to mail a file you can
- simply sign it using your MUA.
-
-<Q> Where is the "encrypt-to-self" option?
-
- Use "--encrypt-to your_keyid". You can use more than one of these
- options. To temporarily override the use of this additional key,
- you can use the option "--no-encrypt-to".
-
-<Q> How can I get rid of the Version and Comment headers in armored
- messages?
-
- Use "--no-version --comment ''". Note that the left over blank line
- is required by the protocol.
-
-<Q> What does the "You are using the xxxx character set." mean?
-
- This note is printed when UTF8 mapping has to be done. Make sure
- that the displayed charset is the one you have activated on your
- system. Since "iso-8859-1" is the charset most used, this is the
- default. You can change the charset with the option "--charset".
- It is important that your active character set matches the one
- displayed - if not, restrict yourself to plain 7 bit ASCII and no
- mapping has to be done.
-
-<Q> How can a get list of key IDs used to encrypt a message?
-
- [H pre]
- gpg --batch --decrypt --list-only --status-fd 1 2>/dev/null | \
- awk '/^\[GNUPG:\] ENC_TO / { print $3 }'
- [H /pre]
-
-<Q> I can't decrypt my symmetrical only (-c) encrypted message with
- a new version of GnuPG.
-
- There used to be a bug in GnuPG < 1.0.1 which happens only if 3DES
- or Twofish has been used for symmetric only encryption (this has
- never been the default). The bug has been fixed but to enable you
- to decrypt old messages, you should run gpg with the option
- "--emulate-3des-s2k-bug", decrypt the message and encrypt it again
- without this option. The option will be removed in 1.1, so better
- re-encrypt your message now.
-
-<Q> How can I use GnuPG in an automated environment?
-
- You should use the option --batch and don't use pass phrases as
- there is usually no way to store it more secure than the secret
- keyring itself. The suggested way to create the keys for the
- automated environment is:
-
- On a secure machine:
- [H OL]
- [H LI] If you want to do automatic signing, create a signing
- subkey for your key (edit menu, choose "addkey" and the DSA).
- [H LI] Make sure that you use a passphrase (needed by the current
- implementation).
- [H LI] gpg --export-secret-subkeys --no-comment foo >secring.auto
- [H LI] Copy secring.auto and the public keyring to a test directory.
- [H LI] Change to this directory.
- [H LI] gpg --homedir . --edit foo and use "passwd" to remove the
- passphrase from the subkeys. You may also want to remove all
- unused subkeys.
- [H LI] Copy secring.auto to a floppy and carry it to the target box.
- [H /OL]
-
- On the target machine:
- [H OL]
- [H LI] Install secring.auto as secret keyring.
- [H LI] Now you can start your new service. It is a good idea to
- install some intrusion detection system so that you hopefully
- get a notice of an successful intrusion, so that you in turn
- can revoke all the subkeys installed on that machine and
- install new subkeys.
- [H /OL]
-
-<Q> Which email-client can I use with GnuPG?
-
- Using GnuPG to encrypt email is one of the most popular uses.
- Several mail clients or mail user-agents (MUA) support GnuPG at
- varying degrees. Simplifying a bit, there are two ways mail can be
- encrypted with GnuPG: the "old style" ASCII armor, i.e. plain text
- encryption, and RFC2015 style (previously PGP/MIME, now OpenPGP).
- The latter has full MIME support. Some MUAs support only one of
- them, so whichever you actually use depends on your needs as well
- as the capabilities of your addressee.
-
- The following list is probably not exhaustive:
-
- OpenPGP: Mutt (Unix), Emacs/Mew, Becky2 (Windows, with plugin),
- TkRat (Unix). There is effort for a Mozilla plugin and
- Emacs/GNUS has support in the current CVS.
-
- ASCII: Emacs/{VM,GNUS}/MailCrypt, Mutt(Unix), Pine(Unix), and
- probably many more.
-
- Good overviews of OpenPGP-support can be found at
- [H a href=http://cryptorights.org/pgp-users/pgp-mail-clients.html]http://cryptorights.org/pgp-users/pgp-mail-clients.html[H /a]
- and [H a href=http://www.geocities.com/openpgp/courrier_en.html]http://www.geocities.com/openpgp/courrier_en.html[H /a].
-
-<Q> Can't we have a gpg library?
-
- This has been frequently requested. However, the current viewpoint
- of the GnuPG maintainers is that this would lead to several security
- issues and will therefore not be implemented in the foreseeable
- future. However, for some areas of application gpgme could do the
- trick. You'll find it at [H a href=ftp://ftp.guug.de/pub/gcrypt/alpha/gpgme]ftp://ftp.guug.de/pub/gcrypt/alpha/gpgme[H /a].
-
-<Q> I have successfully generated a revocation certificate, but I don't
- understand how to send it to the key servers.
-
- Most keyservers don't accept a 'bare' revocation certificate. You
- have to import the certificate into gpg first:
-
- [H pre]
- gpg --import my-revocation.asc
- [H /pre]
-
- then send the revoked key to the keyservers:
-
- [H pre]
- gpg --keyserver certserver.pgp.com --send-keys mykeyid
- [H /pre]
-
- (or use a keyserver web interface for this).
-
-<Q> How do I put my keyring in a different directory?
-
- GnuPG keeps several files in a special homedir directory. These
- include the options file, pubring.gpg, secring.gpg, trustdb.gpg,
- and others. GnuPG will always create and use these files. On unices,
- the homedir is usually ~/.gnupg; on Windows "C:\gnupg\".
-
- If you want to put your keyrings somewhere else, use:
-
- [H pre]
- --homedir /my/path/
- [H /pre]
-
- to make GnuPG create all its files in that directory. Your keyring
- will be "/my/path/pubring.gpg". This way you can store your secrets
- on a floppy disk. Don't use "--keyring" as its purpose is to specify
- additional keyring files.
-
-
-<S> COMPATIBILITY ISSUES
-
-<Dcompat>
-<Q> How can I encrypt a message with GnuPG so that PGP is able to decrypt it?
-
- It depends on the PGP version.
-
- [H UL]
- [H LI]PGP 2.x[H br]
- You can't do that because PGP 2.x normally uses IDEA which is not
- supported by GnuPG as it is patented (see <Ridea>), but if you have a
- modified version of PGP you can try this:
-
- [H pre]
- gpg --rfc1991 --cipher-algo 3des ...
- [H/pre]
-
- Please don't pipe the data to encrypt to gpg but provide it using a
- filename; otherwise, PGP 2 will not be able to handle it.
-
- As for conventional encryption, you can't do this for PGP 2.
-
- [H LI]PGP 5.x and higher[H br]
- You need to provide two additional options:
-
- [H pre]
- --compress-algo 1 --cipher-algo cast5
- [H/pre]
-
- You may also use "3des" instead of "cast5", and "blowfish" does not
- work with all versions of PGP 5. You may also want to put:
-
- [H pre]
- compress-algo 1
- [H/pre]
-
- into your ~/.gnupg/options file - this does not affect normal GnuPG
- operation.
-
- This applies to conventional encryption as well.
- [H /UL]
-
-<Q> How do I migrate from PGP 2.x to GnuPG?
-
- PGP 2 uses the RSA and IDEA encryption algorithms. Whereas the RSA
- patent has expired and RSA is included as of GnuPG 1.0.3, the IDEA
- algorithm is still patented until 2007. Under certain conditions you
- may use IDEA even today. In that case, you may refer to Question
- <Ridea> about how to add IDEA support to GnuPG and read
- [H a href=http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/pgp2x.html]http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/pgp2x.html[H /a] to perform the migration.
-
-<Q> (removed)
-
- (empty)
-
-<Q> Why is PGP 5.x not able to encrypt messages with some keys?
-
- PGP, Inc. refuses to accept ElGamal keys of type 20 even for
- encryption. They only support type 16 (which is identical at least
- for decryption). To be more inter-operable, GnuPG (starting with
- version 0.3.3) now also uses type 16 for the ElGamal subkey which is
- created if the default key algorithm is chosen. You may add a type
- 16 ElGamal key to your public key, which is easy as your key
- signatures are still valid.
-
-<Q> Why is PGP 5.x not able to verify my messages?
-
- PGP 5.x does not accept v4 signatures for data material but OpenPGP
- requests generation of v4 signatures for all kind of data, that's why
- GnuPG defaults to them. Use the option "--force-v3-sigs" to generate
- v3 signatures for data.
-
-<Q> How do I transfer owner trust values from PGP to GnuPG?
-
- There is a script in the tools directory to help you. After you have
- imported the PGP keyring you can give this command:
-
- [H pre]
- $ lspgpot pgpkeyring | gpg --import-ownertrust
- [H /pre]
-
- where pgpkeyring is the original keyring and not the GnuPG keyring
- you might have created in the first step.
-
-<Q> PGP does not like my secret key.
-
- Older PGPs probably bail out on some private comment packets used by
- GnuPG. These packets are fully in compliance with OpenPGP; however
- PGP is not really OpenPGP aware. A workaround is to export the
- secret keys with this command:
-
- [H pre]
- $ gpg --export-secret-keys --no-comment -a your-key-id
- [H /pre]
-
- Another possibility is this: by default, GnuPG encrypts your secret
- key using the Blowfish symmetric algorithm. Older PGPs will only
- understand 3DES, CAST5, or IDEA symmetric algorithms. Using the
- following method you can re-encrypt your secret gpg key with a
- different algo:
-
- [H pre]
- $ gpg --s2k-cipher-algo=CAST5 --s2k-digest-algo=SHA1 \
- --compress-algo=1 --edit-key <username>
- [H /pre]
-
- Then use passwd to change the password (just change it to the same
- thing, but it will encrypt the key with CAST5 this time).
-
- Now you can export it and PGP should be able to handle it.
-
- For PGP 6.x the following options work to export a key:
-
- [H pre]
- $ gpg --s2k-cipher-algo 3des --compress-algo 1 --rfc1991 \
- --export-secret-keys <key-ID>
- [H /pre]
-
-
-<S> PROBLEMS and ERROR MESSAGES
-
-<Q> Why do I get "gpg: Warning: using insecure memory!"
-
- On many systems this program should be installed as setuid(root).
- This is necessary to lock memory pages. Locking memory pages prevents
- the operating system from writing them to disk and thereby keeping your
- secret keys really secret. If you get no warning message about insecure
- memory your operating system supports locking without being root. The
- program drops root privileges as soon as locked memory is allocated.
-
- On UnixWare 2.x and 7.x you should install GnuPG with the 'plock'
- privilege to get the same effect:
-
- [H pre]
- filepriv -f plock /path/to/gpg
- [H /pre]
-
- If you can't or don't want to install GnuPG setuid(root), you can
- use the option "--no-secmem-warning" or put:
-
- [H pre]
- no-secmem-warning
- [H /pre]
-
- in your ~/.gnupg/options file (this disables the warning).
-
- On some systems (e.g., Windows) GnuPG does not lock memory pages
- and older GnuPG versions (<=1.0.4) issue the warning:
-
- [H pre]
- gpg: Please note that you don't have secure memory
- [H /pre]
-
- This warning can't be switched off by the above option because it
- was thought to be too serious an issue. However, it confused users
- too much, so the warning was eventually removed.
-
-<Q> Large File Support doesn't work ...
-
- LFS is correctly working in post-1.0.4 CVS. If configure doesn't
- detect it correctly, try a different (i.e., better) compiler. egcs
- 1.1.2 works fine, other gccs sometimes don't. BTW, several
- compilation problems of GnuPG 1.0.3 and 1.0.4 on HP-UX and Solaris
- were due to broken LFS support.
-
-<Q> In the edit menu the trust values is not displayed correctly after
- signing uids - why?
-
- This happens because some information is stored immediately in
- the trustdb, but the actual trust calculation can be done after the
- save command. This is a "not easy to fix" design bug which will be
- addressed in some future release.
-
-<Q> What does "skipping pubkey 1: already loaded" mean?
-
- As of GnuPG 1.0.3, the RSA algorithm is included. If you still have
- a "load-extension rsa" in your options file, the above message
- occurs. Just remove the load command from the options file.
-
-<Q> GnuPG 1.0.4 doesn't create ~/.gnupg ...
-
- That's a known bug, already fixed in newer versions.
-
-<Q> An ElGamal signature does not verify anymore since version 1.0.2 ...
-
- Use the option --emulate-md-encode-bug.
-
-<Q> Old versions of GnuPG can't verify ElGamal signatures
-
- Update to GnuPG 1.0.2 or newer.
-
-<Q> When I use --clearsign, the plain text has sometimes extra dashes
- in it - why?
-
- This is called dash-escaped text and is required by OpenPGP.
- It always happens when a line starts with a dash ("-") and is
- needed to make the lines that structure signature and text
- (i.e., "-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----") to be the only lines
- that start with two dashes.
-
- If you use GnuPG to process those messages, the extra dashes
- are removed. Good mail clients remove those extra dashes when
- displaying such a message.
-
-<Q> What is the thing with "can't handle multiple signatures"?
-
- Due to different message formats GnuPG is not always able to split
- a file with multiple signatures unambiguously into its parts. This
- error message informs you that there is something wrong with the input.
-
- The only way to have multiple signatures in a file is by using the
- OpenPGP format with one-pass-signature packets (which is GnuPG's
- default) or the cleartext signed format.
-
-<Q> If I submit a key to a keyserver, nothing happens ...
-
- You are most likely using GnuPG 1.0.2 or older on Windows. That's
- feature isn't yet implemented, but it's a bug not to say it. Newer
- versions issue a warning. Upgrade to 1.0.4 or newer.
-
-<Q> I get "gpg: waiting for lock ..."
-
- A previous gpg has most likely exited abnormally and left a lock
- file. Go to ~/.gnupg and look for .*.lock files and remove them.
-
-<Q> Older gpg's (e.g., 1.0) have problems with keys from newer gpgs ...
-
- As of 1.0.3, keys generated with gpg are created with preferences to
- TWOFISH (and AES since 1.0.4) and that also means that they have the
- capability to use the new MDC encryption method. This will go into
- OpenPGP soon and is also suppoted by PGP 7. This new method avoids
- a (not so new) attack on all email encryption systems.
-
- This in turn means that pre-1.0.3 gpg's have problems with newer
- keys. Because of security fixes, you should keep your GnuPG
- installation in a recent state anyway. As a workaround, you can
- force gpg to use a previous default cipher algo by putting:
-
- [H pre]
- cipher-algo cast5
- [H /pre]
-
- into your options file.
-
-<Q> With 1.0.4, I get "this cipher algorithm is deprecated ..."
-
- If you just generated a new key and get this message while
- encrypting, you've witnessed a bug in 1.0.4. It uses the new AES
- cipher Rijndael that is incorrectly being referred as "deprecated".
- Ignore this warning, more recent versions of gpg are corrected.
-
-<Q> Some dates are displayed as ????-??-??, why?
-
- Due to constraints in most libc implementations, dates beyond
- 2038-01-19 can't be displayed correctly. 64 bit OSes are not
- affected by this problem. To avoid printing wrong dates, GnuPG
- instead prints some question marks. To see the correct value, you
- can use the options --with-colons and --fixed-list-mode.
-
-<Q> I still have a problem. How do I report a bug?
-
- Are you sure that it's not been mentioned somewhere on the mailing
- lists? Did you have a look at the bug list (you'll find a link to
- the list of reported bugs on the documentation page). If you're not
- sure about it being a bug, you can send mail to the gnupg-devel
- list. Otherwise, use the GUUG bug tracking system
- [H a href=http://bugs.guug.de/Reporting.html]http://bugs.guug.de/Reporting.html[H /a].
-
-<Q> Why doesn't GnuPG support X509 certificates?
-
- GnuPG, first and foremost, is an implementation of the OpenPGP
- standard (RFC 2440), which is a competing infrastructure, different
- from X509.
-
- They are both public-key cryptosystems, but how the public keys are
- actually handled is different.
-
-<Q> Why do national characters in my user ID look funny?
-
- According to OpenPGP, GnuPG encodes user ID strings (and other
- things) using UTF-8. In this encoding of Unicode, most national
- characters get encoded as two- or three-byte sequences. For
- example, &aring; (0xE5 in ISO-8859-1) becomes &Atilde;&yen; (0xC3,
- 0xA5). This might also be the reason why keyservers can't find
- your key.
-
-<Q> I get 'sed' errors when running ./configure on Mac OS X ...
-
- This will be fixed after GnuPG has been upgraded to autoconf-2.50.
- Until then, find the line setting CDPATH in the configure script
- and place a:
-
- [H pre]
- unset CDPATH
- [H /pre]
-
- statement below it.
-
-<Q> Why does GnuPG 1.0.6 bail out on keyrings used with 1.0.7?
-
- There is a small bug in 1.0.6 which didn't parse trust packets
- correctly. You may want to apply this patch if you can't upgrade:
-
- [H pre]
- http://www.gnupg.org/developer/gpg-woody-fix.txt
- [H /pre]
-
-
-<S> ADVANCED TOPICS
-
-<Q> How does this whole thing work?
-
- To generate a secret/public keypair, run:
-
- [H pre]
- gpg --gen-key
- [H/pre]
-
- and choose the default values.
-
- Data that is encrypted with a public key can only be decrypted by
- the matching secret key. The secret key is protected by a password,
- the public key is not.
-
- So to send your friend a message, you would encrypt your message
- with his public key, and he would only be able to decrypt it by
- having the secret key and putting in the password to use his secret
- key.
-
- GnuPG is also useful for signing things. Things that are encrypted
- with the secret key can be decrypted with the public key. To sign
- something, a hash is taken of the data, and then the hash is in some
- form encoded with the secret key. If someone has your public key, they
- can verify that it is from you and that it hasn't changed by checking
- the encoded form of the hash with the public key.
-
- A keyring is just a large file that stores keys. You have a public
- keyring where you store yours and your friend's public keys. You have
- a secret keyring that you keep your secret key on, and should be very
- careful with. Never ever give anyone else access to it and use a *good*
- passphrase to protect the data in it.
-
- You can 'conventionally' encrypt something by using the option 'gpg -c'.
- It is encrypted using a passphrase, and does not use public and secret
- keys. If the person you send the data to knows that passphrase, they
- can decrypt it. This is usually most useful for encrypting things to
- yourself, although you can encrypt things to your own public key in the
- same way. It should be used for communication with partners you know
- and where it is easy to exchange the passphrases (e.g. with your boy
- friend or your wife). The advantage is that you can change the
- passphrase from time to time and decrease the risk, that many old
- messages may be decrypted by people who accidently got your passphrase.
-
- You can add and copy keys to and from your keyring with the 'gpg
- --import' and 'gpg --export' option. 'gpg --export-secret-keys' will
- export secret keys. This is normally not useful, but you can generate
- the key on one machine then move it to another machine.
-
- Keys can be signed under the 'gpg --edit-key' option. When you sign a
- key, you are saying that you are certain that the key belongs to the
- person it says it comes from. You should be very sure that is really
- that person: You should verify the key fingerprint with:
-
- [H pre]
- gpg --fingerprint user-id
- [H/pre]
-
- over the phone (if you really know the voice of the other person), at a
- key signing party (which are often held at computer conferences), or at
- a meeting of your local GNU/Linux User Group.
-
- Hmm, what else. You may use the option "-o filename" to force output
- to this filename (use "-" to force output to stdout). "-r" just lets
- you specify the recipient (which public key you encrypt with) on the
- command line instead of typing it interactively.
-
- Oh yeah, this is important. By default all data is encrypted in some
- weird binary format. If you want to have things appear in ASCII text
- that is readable, just add the '-a' option. But the preferred method
- is to use a MIME aware mail reader (Mutt, Pine and many more).
-
- There is a small security glitch in the OpenPGP (and therefore GnuPG)
- system; to avoid this you should always sign and encrypt a message
- instead of only encrypting it.
-
-<Q> Why are some signatures with an ELG-E key valid?
-
- These are ElGamal keys generated by GnuPG in v3 (RFC 1991) packets.
- The OpenPGP draft later changed the algorithm identifier for ElGamal
- keys which are usable for signatures and encryption from 16 to 20.
- GnuPG now uses 20 when it generates new ElGamal keys but still
- accepts 16 (which is according to OpenPGP "encryption only") if this
- key is in a v3 packet. GnuPG is the only program which had used
- these v3 ElGamal keys - so this assumption is quite safe.
-
-<Q> How does the whole trust thing work?
-
- It works more or less like PGP. The difference is that the trust is
- computed at the time it is needed. This is one of the reasons for
- the trustdb which holds a list of valid key signatures. If you are
- not running in batch mode you will be asked to assign a trust
- parameter (ownertrust) to a key.
-
- You can see the validity (calculated trust value) using this
- command.
-
- [H pre]
- gpg --list-keys --with-colons
- [H/pre]
-
- If the first field is "pub" or "uid", the second field shows you the
- trust:
-
- [H pre]
- o = Unknown (this key is new to the system)
- e = The key has expired
- q = Undefined (no value assigned)
- n = Don't trust this key at all
- m = There is marginal trust in this key
- f = The key is full trusted
- u = The key is ultimately trusted; this is only used
- for keys for which the secret key is also available.
- r = The key has been revoked
- d = The key has been disabled
- [H/pre]
-
- The value in the "pub" record is the best one of all "uid" records.
- You can get a list of the assigned trust values (how much you trust
- the owner to correctly sign another person's key) with:
-
- [H pre]
- gpg --list-ownertrust
- [H/pre]
-
- The first field is the fingerprint of the primary key, the second
- field is the assigned value:
-
- [H pre]
- - = No Ownertrust value yet assigned.
- n = Never trust this keyholder to correctly verify others signatures.
- m = Have marginal trust in the keyholders capability to sign other
- keys.
- f = Assume that the key holder really knows how to sign keys.
- u = No need to trust ourself because we have the secret key.
- [H/pre]
-
- Keep these values confidential because they express your opinions
- about others. PGP stores this information with the keyring thus it
- is not a good idea to publish a PGP keyring instead of exporting the
- keyring. GnuPG stores the trust in the trustdb.gpg file so it is okay
- to give a gpg keyring away (but we have a --export command too).
-
-<Q> What kind of output is this: "key C26EE891.298, uid 09FB: ...."?
-
- This is the internal representation of a user ID in the trustdb.
- "C26EE891" is the keyid, "298" is the local ID (a record number in
- the trustdb) and "09FB" is the last two bytes of a ripe-md-160 hash
- of the user ID for this key.
-
-<Q> How do I interpret some of the informational outputs?
-
- While checking the validity of a key, GnuPG sometimes prints some
- information which is prefixed with information about the checked
- item.
-
- [H pre]
- "key 12345678.3456"
- [H/pre]
-
- This is about the key with key ID 12345678 and the internal number
- 3456, which is the record number of the so called directory record
- in the trustdb.
-
- [H pre]
- "uid 12345678.3456/ACDE"
- [H/pre]
-
- This is about the user ID for the same key. To identify the user ID
- the last two bytes of a ripe-md-160 over the user ID ring is printed.
-
- [H pre]
- "sig 12345678.3456/ACDE/9A8B7C6D"
- [H/pre]
-
- This is about the signature with key ID 9A8B7C6D for the above key
- and user ID, if it is a signature which is direct on a key, the user
- ID part is empty (..//..).
-
-<Q> Are the header lines of a cleartext signature part of the signed
- material?
-
- No. For example you can add or remove "Comment:" lines. They have
- a purpose like the mail header lines. However a "Hash:" line is
- needed for OpenPGP signatures to tell the parser which hash
- algorithm to use.
-
-<Q> What is the list of preferred algorithms?
-
- The list of preferred algorithms is a list of cipher, hash and
- compression algorithms stored in the self-signature of a key during
- key generation. When you encrypt a document, GnuPG uses this list
- (which is then part of a public key) to determine which algorithms
- to use. Basically it tells other people what algorithms the
- recipient is able to handle and provides an order of preference.
-
-<Q> How do I change the list of preferred algorithms?
-
- In version 1.0.7 or later, you can use the edit menu and set the
- new list of preference using the command "setpref"; the format of
- this command resembles the output of the command "pref". The
- preference is not changed immediately but the set preference will
- be used when a new user ID is created. If you want to update the
- preferences for existing user IDs, select those user IDs (or select
- none to update all) and enter the command "updpref". Note that the
- timestamp of the self-signature is increased by one second when
- running this command.
-
-
-<S> ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
-
- Many thanks to Nils Ellmenreich for maintaining this FAQ file for
- a long time, Werner Koch for the original FAQ file, and to all
- posters to gnupg-users and gnupg-devel. They all provided most
- of the answers.
-
- Also thanks to Casper Dik for providing us with a script to generate
- this FAQ (he uses it for the excellent Solaris2 FAQ).
-
-[H HR]
-
-Copyright (C) 2000-2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
-59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111, USA
-
-Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in
-any medium, provided this notice is preserved.