aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/doc/a-decade-of-gnupg.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/a-decade-of-gnupg.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/a-decade-of-gnupg.txt20
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/a-decade-of-gnupg.txt b/doc/a-decade-of-gnupg.txt
index 7ab57a865..7d625dfc6 100644
--- a/doc/a-decade-of-gnupg.txt
+++ b/doc/a-decade-of-gnupg.txt
@@ -196,3 +196,23 @@ Happy Hacking,
[8] http://partners.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/11/cyber/articles/19encrypt.html
[9] http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/5/5124/1.html
+=== Remarks ===
+
+In a reply to this mail Alan Olsen remakrked on the ML:
+
+ MIT was forced to use the RSAREF library which had a non free
+ license. At first they used the RSAREF2 library, but then they were
+ told to use the RSAREF1 library. (I diffed the two libraries and
+ determined that the only difference was that RSAREF2 had fixed a
+ number of buffer overflows and other security flaws. There were no
+ added features.)
+
+ If I remember correctly, 2.5 had RSAREF2 and 2.6 had RSAREF1. One
+ of the main reasons for the creation of the "International version"
+ was the use of RSAREF. (Besides the security issues, it was pretty
+ damn slow. In the days of the i386 people cared about speed.)
+
+Jaime Suarez translated the text in his blog, see
+
+ http://wordpress.mundocripto.com
+